Frames /sing


Mark Taylor Attempts to Take Down

I post this here for traffic because this seems like a worthy topic for the internet few to read. It seems that the Napster of academic presses has been forced to change its practices by a former music industry publishing advisor to Macmillan.

Read the related articles at blog: Macmillan and Mark Taylor take down

Thanks Matt for the clarification.

8 responses to “Mark Taylor Attempts to Take Down

  1. kvond April 24, 2010 at 5:55 pm

    Thanks Matt. I was just getting into Mark C. Taylor’s interesting Confidence Games to see if there is argument for such an action. Good to know it was a music industry type…or perhaps not so good.

  2. Nathan April 26, 2010 at 1:29 am

    Thankfully is operational again. There was a period of about a week where the community threw around some ideas on how to keep the site running. The site has been threated with legal action a number of times from what I am aware. Other than the most recent speculation that Mark Taylor was involved with the brief cessation of being operational, the other most notable case was the letter AAAARG’s administrators received from Verso.

    It will be interesting to see how things progress not only for sites like AAAARG, (which there are many), but also for academic publishing in the future. Is it reasonable to ask: “what role can academics play in all of this?” I’ve always though it interesting to read what academics have to say about this subject, given that Matthew Calarco has in some form responded to the topic by posting a coment here, and that we can find his work linked to at places like

    Personally, I think we need to look closely at how Re.Press are operating at the moment.

  3. kvond April 26, 2010 at 2:07 am

    Thanks for more detail Nathan. Interesting that Verso was pressuring as well. I too think that academia must weigh in upon this at the LEVEL of ethics and theory, instead of remaining complicit. Much of the Left/Revolutionary thinking that characterizes Continental thinking is deeply entrenched in explicit structures of Instutional and publishing control. At the very least this is exactly where theory and practice meet. I’m not saying that indeed one must either take a stand against or for file sharing of intellectual works, but I do think there is a call for an articulation from authors themselves.

  4. Maurice Faustrillo May 27, 2010 at 4:24 am

    I am posting here because when I refreshed this morning, it was with disappointment but not surprise, the writing having been on the wall for some time, that I found it no longer exists — or does it? Any leads welcome.

    • Nathan January 4, 2011 at 10:36 pm is operational, however, is not. It appears, though, some are experiencing difficulties with the site. What the reason is I’m not sure.

  5. Simon Taylor January 13, 2011 at 5:35 pm

    I am posting this because although I have contacted I was curious to read if others have experienced the same problem and perhaps have advice on how it may be overcome. My server is suddenly blocking aaaaarg. My first hyperlink from YESTERDAY returned: Forbidden

    You don’t have permission to access /text/20122/instant-my-death on this server.

    While ironic, still annoying. And with further clicks and address-tweaks no progress.


  6. Simon Taylor January 19, 2011 at 7:25 pm

    transmission resumed.

    without explanation.

    thank you, someone.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: